We didn’t even need to see the latest personal income figures from the Bureau of Economic Analysis to know that unemployment benefits and the recovery in income were likely to dip as the multitude of federal benefits under the original CARES Act began expiring. Sure enough, when August figures were released, they confirmed our suspicion.
In last week’s newsletter, we analogized our economy to a kite and demand to wind that keeps the kite aloft. Well as we can see in the latest round of economic data for August, the winds are beginning to fade, and will likely do so into September, which is why the discussions between the Democrats and Republicans on the next round of fiscal stimulus have been so critical.
Let’s run-through the “demand” side of the equation and discuss the recent release of economic data. Now what creates demand is employment, it’s the first step. Employment equals income and income equals spending (i.e., demand). For September, the unemployment rate fell to 7.9% as the number of jobs increased by 661K (non-farm payrolls). On its face, this appears to be a solid reduction, but dig a bit deeper and we can see that the civilian labor force fell by 695K, so a large part of the decline in unemployment rate actually comes from workers leaving the labor force.
Overall the labor picture continues to paint a portrait of a weakening recovery. What started robustly has now begun to fade. After adding on average of 2.5M jobs per month since May, August figures were decidedly lower. The longer the pandemic lasts, the more energy it’s sapping away from our recovery. The stop/star nature of localized restrictions and quarantines creates enough uncertainty for most employers to back away from aggressively rehiring, which means the economic recovery continues to be put off. Moreover, the longer this lasts, the more things will stay permanent as we can see permanent job losses increasing.
All of this translates to lower personal income, and we are still a ways off from our “normal” pre-COVID levels. A 7.9% unemployment rate means we’ve shed 9.5M jobs YOY. In turn, personal income is $4-500B (annualized) lower, and the transfer payment from the government (i.e., all of those stimulus checks and extra federal unemployment benefits) that bridged us over the gap have begun to expire. In aggregate, the funds have begun to fall materially.
In turn, we can see personal savings (as a % of disposable income) fall further as the months drag on.
Notice the large increase in April when the government rained down $1,200 stimulus checks and extra unemployment benefits, well that’s since whittled away as households dip into their savings to pay rent and other expenditures. What we need now is another round of fiscal stimulus, to artificially prop-up the economy as we wait for the vaccine.
To Stimulate or Not Stimulate . . . That is the Question
Last week, reports of on/off discussions between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin appeared to be yielding results on rejuvenating a stalled stimulus bill, no doubt aided in part by the thousands of layoffs announced throughout the week by airlines and affected industries. Following constructive talks, however, a different tale emerged this week after the surprising news on Friday that the President and a host of West Wing staffers had contracted COVID.
A Stay at Walter Reed
This was a bombshell revelation and the media breathlessly covered his hospitalization over the weekend. After being discharged from Walter Reed, the President is now recuperating in the White House. His campaign, unfortunately (or fortunately depending on who you support), is now the ICU.
The damage may have already been done as predictive markets (i.e., gambling sites) saw former Vice President Biden’s chances of winning surge past 60%. Equally as important is that Democrats are now projected to win 50 seats, and if a Biden administration is ushered in then we can expect a larger “Green Energy” stimulus following the one currently being negotiated.
This likely explains why the Democrats have been hesitant to compromise on a “lesser” fiscal stimulus than their current $2.2T offer. As the likelihood of a “Democratic Blue Wave” sweep has increased, Democrats have held firm on the higher figure, believing correctly that Republicans, and in particular the White House, needs a deal more than they do. If Democrats were to win both the White House and Senate, then a larger stimulus bill can be had in short-order, so why compromise at this stage?
Republican Senators similarly see the writing on the wall. With a mortally wounded Presidential campaign, and the likelihood of a Trump win diminishing, Republicans have had to shift their focus, from fealty to the current administration to one where they can uphold “traditional” Republican values (i.e., perceived fiscal conservatism). If the voters don’t vote for Trump, what you don’t want is to have that choice cascade down ballot. So it’s time to differentiate yourself.
Thus, we believe the President’s recent rejection of the stimulus package wasn’t that he disagreed with the price tag, he is after all a “deal maker,” it’s more likely he couldn’t sell Republicans in the Senate on the matter. In the end, barring a miracle breakthrough, the size and timing of any stimulus bill will depend on who wins the election (both White House and Senate).
As investors though, we can clearly see our economic recovery stalling here. So while we understand the balance of power and the massive momentum/leverage swing to the Democrats, we can’t help but wonder how many more layoffs and unemployed workers we will have in the near future because political needs outweighed economic ones. Sadly, if there’s one thing certain in Washington during election season, it’s that a politician’s impending unemployment will outweigh yours.
For the market though, a few catalysts are fast approaching. We expect to hear in a few weeks the results of Pfizer’s vaccine trials, as clinical data is set to be released sometime in late-October. If efficacious, expect an accelerated FDA approval. The EU and Japan will likely leverage the data and quickly follow-suit, and then we’re off to the races in terms of manufacturing. Other vaccines should follow in short order (e.g., Moderna, Astrazeneca, Inovio, or JNJ). A week or two thereafter? Elections. The Big One.
Biden’s Plans
As November 3rd approaches, we’ll begin to turn our attention to the type of policies a Biden administration will likely usher in. Taxes (i.e., raising corporate rates and taxing offshore intangibles), Green Energy (subsidizing renewables, restricting access to drilling on federal lands, and carbon neutrality), MAGA to Making America Cool Again with a reset of international/trade relations, and etc. All of these things will impact corporate earnings, tax policies (corporate income to customs/tariffs), interest rates, and the strength of the dollar, which means it’s incumbent on us to work through some of these issues. We’ll endeavor to do so.
Join the Distribution List
So that concludes this letter. We’ll send these out weekly, so if you would like to be added to our distribution list click on the subscribe button above. This is our start and it’s our invitation to you to join us and share your thoughts. Welcome to Open Insights and let the conversation begin.